silt: be important in mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, solid
Weight: 0.55
, rock
Weight: 0.54
, sediment
Weight: 0.54
Siblings mud
Weight: 0.34
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, water
Weight: 0.33
, silica
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in mesopotamia 1.00
be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph 0.94
was important to mesopotamia 0.92
be important in soil 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sediment, be important in soil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sediment, be important in soil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sediment, be important in soil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sediment, be important in soil)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(silt, be important in soil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(silt, be important in soil)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(silt, be important in soil)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sediment, be important in soil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sediment, be important in soil)