silt: was important to mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, solid
Weight: 0.55
, rock
Weight: 0.54
, sediment
Weight: 0.54
Siblings mud
Weight: 0.34
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, water
Weight: 0.33
, silica
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to mesopotamia 1.00
be important in mesopotamia 0.92
be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph 0.87
was important to china 0.76
was important to early farmers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia in one paraghraph)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(silt, be important in mesopotamia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(silt, was important to china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(silt, was important to china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(silt, was important to early farmers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(silt, was important to early farmers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(silt, was important to early farmers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(silt, was important to china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to early farmers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mud, was important to mesopotamia)