silt: was important to china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.58
, solid
Weight: 0.55
, rock
Weight: 0.54
, sediment
Weight: 0.54
Siblings mud
Weight: 0.34
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, water
Weight: 0.33
, silica
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to china 1.00
was important to mesopotamia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mud, was important to mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mud, was important to mesopotamia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(silt, was important to china)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to mesopotamia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(silt, was important to mesopotamia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(silt, was important to china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silt, was important to china)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mud, was important to mesopotamia)