silver: be less reactive than copper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.64
, metal
Weight: 0.63
, color
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pewter
Weight: 0.45
, gold
Weight: 0.39
, silver chloride
Weight: 0.36
, copper
Weight: 0.36
, chrome
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less reactive than copper 1.00
be more expensive than copper 0.92
be more conductive than copper 0.88
be less expensive than gold 0.85
less is dense than silver 0.83
be more conductive than gold 0.83
be less valuable than gold 0.82
be more dense than gold 0.82
less is dense than solid silver 0.81
be more volatile than gold 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(gold, be more expensive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(copper, be more conductive than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(copper, be more conductive than gold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(silver, be more expensive than copper)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(silver, be more expensive than copper)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more expensive than copper)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(silver, be more conductive than copper)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(silver, be more conductive than copper)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more conductive than copper)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(silver, be less expensive than gold)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less expensive than gold)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(silver, be more conductive than gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(silver, be more dense than gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(silver, be more dense than gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(silver, be more conductive than gold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(silver, be more volatile than gold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(silver, be more volatile than gold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more dense than gold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more volatile than gold)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(silver, be more conductive than gold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(silver, be more expensive than copper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(silver, be less valuable than gold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(silver, be more conductive than copper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less valuable than gold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(silver, be more conductive than gold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(silver, be less expensive than gold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(silver, be less valuable than gold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(silver, be more dense than gold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(silver, be more volatile than gold)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(silver, be less valuable than gold)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(silver, be less expensive than gold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(silver, be less reactive than copper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gold, be more expensive than copper)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silver, be less reactive than copper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copper, be more conductive than gold)