singer: be at show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.68
, writer
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, star
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.65
, pianist
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, composer
Weight: 0.59
, comedian
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at show 1.00
be appear at show 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(star, be appear at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(singer, be at show)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(singer, be at show)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(musician, be at show)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(star, be appear at show)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(star, be appear at show)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(singer, be at show)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(star, be appear at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(singer, be at show)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(singer, be at show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(singer, be at show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(singer, be at show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(star, be appear at show)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(star, be appear at show)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(singer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show)