sitcom: use canned laughter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, television show
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cheer
Weight: 0.53
, episode
Weight: 0.36
, soap opera
Weight: 0.35
, soap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use canned laughter 1.00
use laughter 0.92
have laughter 0.91
have background laughter 0.86
have laughter tracks 0.84
use laughing 0.79
have fake laughs 0.79
use laugh track 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tv show, use canned laughter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughter)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laughter)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laughter tracks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laughter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laughter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughter tracks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laughter tracks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughter tracks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laughing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tv show, use canned laughter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tv show, use canned laughter)