sitcom: use laughing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, television show
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cheer
Weight: 0.53
, episode
Weight: 0.36
, soap opera
Weight: 0.35
, soap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use laughing 1.00
have laughing in background 0.89
using laugh track 0.83
use laugh track 0.82
use laughter 0.81
use laugh tracks 0.80
use canned laughter 0.79
have laughter 0.79
have laugh tracks 0.79
have fake laughs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tv show, have laugh tracks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tv show, use canned laughter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tv show, use canned laughter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laughing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sitcom, use canned laughter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laughter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laughter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use canned laughter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sitcom, use canned laughter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use canned laughter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have fake laughs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laughter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sitcom, have fake laughs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tv show, have laugh tracks)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tv show, use canned laughter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tv show, have laugh tracks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sitcom, use laughing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tv show, use canned laughter)