sitting: be bad day

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, time
Weight: 0.51
, week
Weight: 0.48
Siblings living thing
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, laughing
Weight: 0.32
, hanging
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad day 1.00
is long bad 0.83
is too long bad 0.81
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hanging, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hanging, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hanging, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sitting, be bad day)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sitting, is long bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sitting, is too long bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitting, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sitting, is long bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sitting, is long bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sitting, is too long bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sitting, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sitting, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sitting, is too long bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sitting, is long bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sitting, is too long bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sitting, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sitting, be bad day)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hanging, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sitting, be bad day) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)