size: be important in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.59
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings diameter
Weight: 0.65
, aperture
Weight: 0.62
, rectangle
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.60
, gallon
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in design 1.00
be used in architecture 0.82
be important to project 0.77
be important in art 0.77
be used in philippine architecture 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(size, be important in design)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(value, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(size, be important in design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(value, be important in art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(value, be important to project)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in art)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to project)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, be used in philippine architecture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, be important in art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, be used in architecture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(value, be important to project)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(size, be important in design)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(value, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(size, be important in design)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rectangle, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rectangle, be used in architecture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rectangle, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rectangle, be important in art)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rectangle, be used in philippine architecture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rectangle, be used in philippine architecture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(size, be important in design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(size, be important in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in art)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rectangle, be used in architecture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rectangle, be used in philippine architecture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rectangle, be important in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(value, be important to project)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(size, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in art)