skateboard: have wheels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.53
, sport
Weight: 0.52
, toy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings skateboarding
Weight: 0.36
, bicycle
Weight: 0.35
, bike
Weight: 0.35
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.34
, surfboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wheels 1.00
have small wheels 0.94
be better than bikes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have wheels)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bike, have wheels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bike, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bike, have wheels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(motorcycle, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, have wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(skateboard, have wheels)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have small wheels)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(skateboard, have small wheels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, be better than bikes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(skateboard, be better than bikes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(skateboard, be better than bikes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(skateboard, have small wheels)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(skateboard, be better than bikes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(skateboard, have small wheels)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(skateboard, have wheels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bike, have wheels)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(skateboard, have wheels)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have wheels)