skunk: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
come out in summer time 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(skunk, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(skunk, come out in summer time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(skunk, come out in summer time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(skunk, come out in summer time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(skunk, come out in summer time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skunk, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(skunk, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(skunk, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skunk, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skunk, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has quality bad)