skunk: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(prairie dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(skunk, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skunk, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(skunk, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(skunk, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skunk, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(skunk, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prairie dog, has quality bad)