skunk: be illegal as pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal as pets 1.00
make good pets 0.88
become good pets 0.87
is bad pet 0.82
has state pet 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skunk, make good pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skunk, become good pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(skunk, make good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(skunk, make good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(skunk, become good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(skunk, become good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(skunk, is bad pet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skunk, has state pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(skunk, is bad pet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(skunk, make good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(skunk, is bad pet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(skunk, has state pet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(skunk, has state pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(skunk, become good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(skunk, has state pet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skunk, is bad pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets)