skunk: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is bad pet 0.93
become good pets 0.82
make good pets 0.81
be illegal as pets 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(skunk, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(skunk, is bad pet)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(skunk, is bad pet)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(skunk, is bad pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skunk, become good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(skunk, become good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skunk, make good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(skunk, make good pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(skunk, be illegal as pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(skunk, become good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(skunk, make good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(skunk, be illegal as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(skunk, be illegal as pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(skunk, make good pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(skunk, become good pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skunk, is bad pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skunk, be illegal as pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(skunk, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(skunk, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skunk, has state pet)