slack: is valued high

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.46
, time
Weight: 0.42
, tool
Weight: 0.38
, resource
Weight: 0.34
, event
Weight: 0.33
Siblings pick
Weight: 0.29
, pressure point
Weight: 0.29
, pace
Weight: 0.29
, rebound
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valued high 1.00
is valued 0.96
be valued at $ 5 billion 0.83
be valued at over $ 5 billion 0.83
has quality worth 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(slack, is valued high)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(slack, is valued high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(slack, is valued high)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(slack, be valued at $ 5 billion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(slack, be valued at over $ 5 billion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(slack, be valued at $ 5 billion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(slack, be valued at over $ 5 billion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(slack, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(slack, be valued at $ 5 billion)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(slack, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(slack, is valued)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(slack, be valued at over $ 5 billion)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(slack, be valued at $ 5 billion)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(slack, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(slack, be valued at over $ 5 billion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(slack, is valued)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(slack, is valued)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(slack, is valued)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(slack, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(slack, is valued high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(slack, is valued high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(slack, is valued high)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)