slavery: was in north

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sin
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.67
, evil
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.61
Siblings genocide
Weight: 0.35
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, segregation
Weight: 0.34
, nazism
Weight: 0.34
, idolatry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in north 1.00
was defeted in south 0.99
was in south 0.99
was in west 0.98
be in north 0.97
be in south 0.96
was important to north 0.96
was used in south 0.95
was in more south 0.95
was different in north 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(segregation, was different in north)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(slavery, was in north)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(slavery, be in south)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in south)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was used in south)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slavery, was in south)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(slavery, was in south)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(slavery, was in south)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(slavery, be in south)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(slavery, was used in south)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(slavery, was used in south)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(slavery, was used in south)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(slavery, be in south)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(slavery, be in south)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(slavery, was defeted in south)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in north)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(slavery, was in north)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(segregation, was different in north)