sloth: be at tree

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree 1.00
be at euculiptus tree 1.00
be at tree top 0.92
be at tree trunk 0.91
be at ficus tree 0.89
be at hang from tree 0.88
hang from tree 0.88
be hang from tree 0.88
be at banana tree 0.87
be hang off tree 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tree top)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at ficus tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(monkey, hang from tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be hang from tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be hang off tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monkey, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tree)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(monkey, be at tree top)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tree top)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(monkey, be at ficus tree)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at ficus tree)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(monkey, be hang from tree)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, be hang from tree)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(monkey, hang from tree)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, hang from tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(monkey, be hang off tree)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monkey, be hang off tree)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(lizard, be at tree trunk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at tree trunk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(sloth, be at tree)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at euculiptus tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, be at tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tree top)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at ficus tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monkey, hang from tree)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monkey, be hang from tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monkey, be hang off tree)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at tree)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lizard, be at tree trunk)