sloth: leave tree to poop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, beast
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
leave tree to poop 1.00
leave trees to poop 0.97
come out of tree 0.88
leave trees 0.87
go to poop 0.86
bury poop 0.82
live in trees 0.82
poop week 0.81
fall out of trees 0.81
poop once week 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(monkey, live in trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live in trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sloth, leave trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sloth, leave trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sloth, come out of tree)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sloth, leave trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sloth, come out of tree)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, come out of tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, leave trees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(sloth, go to poop)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in trees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sloth, come out of tree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sloth, go to poop)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sloth, live in trees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sloth, fall out of trees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sloth, go to poop)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sloth, live in trees)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sloth, fall out of trees)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sloth, fall out of trees)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sloth, go to poop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sloth, fall out of trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sloth, leave tree to poop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sloth, leave tree to poop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)