sloth: live in canopy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, beast
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in canopy 1.00
live in canopy layer 0.93
live in tropical rainforest 0.76
live in rainforest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in canopy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in canopy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sloth, live in canopy)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy layer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in canopy layer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sloth, live in canopy layer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy layer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sloth, live in canopy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)