sloth: live in rainforest

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.68 , animal Weight: 0.67 , thing Weight: 0.49 , species Weight: 0.49 , mammal Weight: 0.48
Siblings	lizard Weight: 0.36 , gnome Weight: 0.35 , beast Weight: 0.35 , monkey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
live in rainforest	1.00
live in tropical rainforest	0.95
adapt in rainforest	0.90
adapt to rainforest	0.90
adapt in tropical rainforest	0.89
be important for ecosystem of rainforest	0.89
survive in rain forests	0.79
live in canopy	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(mammal, live in rainforest)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt in rainforest)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt to rainforest)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(sloth, live in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in rainforest)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in rainforest)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in rainforest)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(sloth, survive in rain forests)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in rainforest)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(sloth, live in canopy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(sloth, survive in rain forests)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(sloth, live in canopy)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(sloth, survive in rain forests)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(sloth, live in canopy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(sloth, survive in rain forests)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in canopy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(monkey, adapt in rainforest)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(monkey, adapt to rainforest)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(sloth, live in rainforest) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)