smell: has state taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, sensation
Weight: 0.62
, odor
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.34
, mildew
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state taste 1.00
be important for taste 0.89
be important than taste 0.87
affect taste 0.86
affect much taste 0.85
affect taste of food 0.85
be more important than taste 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(smell, has state taste)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smell, be important than taste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(smell, affect taste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(smell, be important for taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(smell, be important than taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(smell, be important than taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important than taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smell, be more important than taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(smell, affect taste of food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste of food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste of food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(smell, be more important than taste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(smell, be important for taste)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smell, be more important than taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(smell, be more important than taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(smell, has state taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(smell, has state taste)