smell: be important for taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, sensation
Weight: 0.62
, odor
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings smoke
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.34
, mildew
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for taste 1.00
be important than taste 0.97
be more important than taste 0.92
affect taste 0.90
affect much taste 0.90
has state taste 0.89
affect taste of food 0.87
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(smell, be important for taste)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(smell, be important for taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fart, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(smell, be important for taste)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smell, be important than taste)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(smell, be important than taste)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(smell, be more important than taste)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smell, be important for taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(smell, be important for taste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)