smoothies: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different in different countries 0.81
taste concentrated 0.81
taste different in cans 0.81
taste better in styrofoam 0.80
taste more concentrated 0.80
taste shitty at room temperature 0.80
taste concentrated at end 0.79
has quality good 0.79
taste better in glass bottles 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(smoothies, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smoothies, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(smoothies, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(smoothies, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(smoothies, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(smoothies, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)