smoothies: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
taste good 0.79
be bad for us 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(smoothie, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chocolate milk, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(smoothies, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(smoothies, is great)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(smoothies, taste good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(smoothies, is great)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(smoothies, taste good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(smoothies, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smoothies, taste good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, is great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(smoothies, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)