smoothies: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.31
Siblings smoothie
Weight: 0.28
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.28
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.28
, soda
Weight: 0.28
, apple juice
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for people 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
go bad 0.79
be bad for human health 0.77
taste good 0.77
be bad for body 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for body)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for body)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soda, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(soda, be bad for people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(smoothie, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apple juice, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(apple juice, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soda, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(soda, go bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(soda, be bad for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soda, be bad for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(smoothies, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(smoothies, taste good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(smoothies, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(smoothies, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smoothies, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(smoothies, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smoothies, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(smoothie, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apple juice, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(soda, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(soda, be bad for people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(smoothies, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for body)