snack: be used to snack

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, salad
Weight: 0.59
, drink
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
Siblings candy bar
Weight: 0.73
, potato chip
Weight: 0.72
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.72
, pretzel
Weight: 0.71
, soft drink
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to snack 1.00
be eat with pizza 0.80
be defined as soda 0.79
requires buy soda 0.79
be a part of meal 0.78
be used to eat 0.78
be eat 0.77
requires get beverage 0.77
requires consume beverage 0.77
be motivated by refreshment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, be eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(salad, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(salad, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, be eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drink, be a part of meal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, be eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(salad, be used to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be defined as soda)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, be eat)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(salad, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(drink, be a part of meal)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(snack, be used to snack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be eat with pizza)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(soft drink, be defined as soda)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be defined as soda)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(snack, be used to snack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(snack, be used to snack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(salad, be eat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(salad, be used to eat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(drink, be a part of meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(soft drink, be defined as soda)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(potato chip, be eat with pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(salad, be eat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(salad, be used to eat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drink, be motivated by refreshment)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(snack, be used to snack)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(drink, be a part of meal)