snake: attack humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.78
, python
Weight: 0.76
, rattlesnake
Weight: 0.74
, copperhead
Weight: 0.69
, black mamba
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack humans 1.00
bite humans 0.80
be useful to humans 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(snake, attack humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pet, attack humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(python, attack humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(snake, attack humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(python, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(python, attack humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(snake, attack humans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(snake, be useful to humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(snake, be useful to humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(snake, be useful to humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(snake, be useful to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(snake, attack humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(python, attack humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(snake, attack humans)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)