pet: attack humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.84
help humans 0.82
be beneficial to humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(snake, attack humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(snake, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(snake, attack humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pet, attack humans)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pet, help humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pet, help humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pet, be important to humans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pet, help humans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pet, be important to humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to humans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pet, help humans)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pet, be beneficial to humans)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pet, be important to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pet, attack humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, attack humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(snake, attack humans)