snake: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.63
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.78
, python
Weight: 0.76
, rattlesnake
Weight: 0.74
, copperhead
Weight: 0.69
, black mamba
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part tail 0.80
has physical part fangs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(snake, has physical part eyes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(snake, has physical part eyes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rattlesnake, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rattlesnake, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rattlesnake, has physical part fangs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(snake, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(snake, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rattlesnake, has physical part fangs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(snake, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)