snow leopard: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leopard
Weight: 0.70
, species
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, carnivore
Weight: 0.67
Siblings snowy owl
Weight: 0.37
, snow goose
Weight: 0.37
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.37
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leopard, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leopard, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(leopard, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leopard, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(snowy owl, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(snow leopard, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, be in danger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(snow leopard, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(snow leopard, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger)