social: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.63
, program
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
Siblings youth
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.32
, gender
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality cost 0.82
has quality services 0.80
has quality influence 0.77
has quality role 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(social, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(social, has quality services)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(social, has quality cost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(social, has quality cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality services)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(social, has quality role)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(social, has quality services)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(social, has quality services)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(social, has quality cost)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality influence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality role)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(social, has quality influence)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(social, has quality role)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(social, has quality influence)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(social, has quality role)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(social, has quality influence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(social, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(social, has quality good)