social: has quality services

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents community
Weight: 0.63
, program
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
Siblings youth
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.32
, gender
Weight: 0.32
, other people
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality services 1.00
has quality cost 0.80
has quality good 0.80
has quality mobility 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(social, has quality services)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality cost)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality mobility)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(social, has quality cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(social, has quality mobility)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(social, has quality cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(social, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(social, has quality mobility)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(social, has quality mobility)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(social, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(social, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(social, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(social, has quality services)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(social, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(social, has quality services)