soft drink: eating chocolate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
eating chocolate 1.00
be important in baking 0.76
is soda 0.76
chewing mint gum 0.76
be named diet coke 0.75
be called soda 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be named diet coke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(diet coke, be named diet coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be named diet coke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(soft drink, eating chocolate)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(soft drink, is soda)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(soft drink, is soda)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is soda)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is soda)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(soft drink, be called soda)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be called soda)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(soft drink, be called soda)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be called soda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, eating chocolate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(soft drink, eating chocolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, eating chocolate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(diet coke, be named diet coke)