soft drink: taste eating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste eating 1.00
taste good 0.88
taste different 0.85
taste weird 0.84
taste cold 0.84
taste better cold 0.82
taste better in cans 0.81
taste better than cans 0.80
taste flat 0.78
taste different in countries 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, taste different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(orange juice, taste different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bottled water, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste eating)

Similarity expansion

0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste weird)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different in countries)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste cold)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste weird)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste weird)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different in countries)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different in countries)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste cold)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste weird)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste different)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste different in countries)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste cold)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste cold)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste eating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diet coke, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(orange juice, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bottled water, taste different)