soft drink: taste better than cans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better than cans 1.00
taste better in cans 0.99
taste better in glass bottles 0.89
taste better in glasses 0.85
taste better cold 0.84
taste good 0.82
taste different 0.82
taste better flat 0.81
taste eating 0.80
taste cold 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, taste different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, taste different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, taste different)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(orange juice, taste different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bottled water, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste eating)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste eating)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste eating)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste eating)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste cold)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diet coke, taste different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(orange juice, taste different)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bottled water, taste different)