soft drink: taste better flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better flat 1.00
taste flat 0.97
taste better cold 0.87
taste good 0.86
taste different 0.84
taste better in glasses 0.81
taste better in cans 0.81
taste better than cans 0.81
taste cold 0.80
taste weird 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, taste different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(orange juice, taste different)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bottled water, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better flat)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste weird)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste cold)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste weird)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste cold)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste weird)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste different)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste weird)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste cold)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste cold)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better flat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diet coke, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(orange juice, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bottled water, taste different)