soft drink: taste better in glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better in glasses 1.00
taste better in glass bottles 0.88
taste better in cans 0.85
taste better than cans 0.85
taste good 0.84
taste better cold 0.84
taste different 0.82
taste better flat 0.81
taste cold 0.80
taste weird 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(diet coke, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, taste different)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(orange juice, taste different)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bottled water, taste different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bottled water, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better flat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glass bottles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste weird)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(soft drink, taste cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste weird)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste cold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste weird)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste cold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better cold)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better than cans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste cold)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste weird)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in glasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diet coke, taste different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(orange juice, taste different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bottled water, taste different)