softball: was first created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, volleyball
Weight: 0.54
Siblings softball game
Weight: 0.38
, baseball game
Weight: 0.37
, baseball team
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.37
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was first created 1.00
was created 0.94
was originally invented 0.80
was inevented 0.78
was made 0.77
was invented 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(volleyball, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(softball, was first created)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(volleyball, was created)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(softball, was first created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(volleyball, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(volleyball, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, was created)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(volleyball, was created)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(softball, was first created)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(volleyball, was invented)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(softball, was first created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(softball, was first created)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(softball, was created)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(softball, was created)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(softball, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(softball, was inevented)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(softball, was made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(softball, was inevented)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(softball, was inevented)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(softball, was originally invented)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(softball, was originally invented)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(softball, was made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(softball, was made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(softball, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(softball, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(softball, was originally invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(softball, was invented)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(softball, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(softball, was originally invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(softball, was inevented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(softball, was invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(softball, was made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(softball, was first created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(softball, was first created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(volleyball, was created)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(volleyball, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(volleyball, was created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(softball, was first created)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(volleyball, was invented)