soil: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.59
, mineral
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
, source
Weight: 0.56
, sediment
Weight: 0.56
Siblings magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.33
, phosphate
Weight: 0.33
, vegetation
Weight: 0.33
, ammonium phosphate
Weight: 0.32
, hydrogen sulfide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is important resource 0.92
be called resource 0.91
has quality resources 0.91
is natural resource 0.90
be considered resource 0.89
be considered nonerenewable resource 0.89
is necessary resource 0.89
is important natural resource 0.89
is valuable resource 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(soil, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(soil, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mineral, is natural resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is natural resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(soil, has quality resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mineral, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(soil, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soil, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(soil, be considered resource)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(soil, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(soil, be considered resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(soil, be considered resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soil, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(soil, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(soil, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mineral, is natural resource)