soldier: shave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enemy
Weight: 0.64
, police officer
Weight: 0.63
, officer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings man
Weight: 0.68
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, medic
Weight: 0.61
, special force
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
shave 1.00
have shave 0.99
have shaved head 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(police officer, have shave)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(soldier, shave)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(police officer, have shave)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(police officer, have shave)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, shave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(police officer, have shave)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(soldier, shave)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(man, shave)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, shave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(soldier, shave)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soldier, have shave)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(soldier, have shave)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(soldier, have shave)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(soldier, have shave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soldier, shave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(soldier, shave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(police officer, have shave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, shave)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(soldier, shave)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(police officer, have shave)