solicitor: is uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is uk 1.00
is expensive uk 0.94
was general of india 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(landlord, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(landlord, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(solicitor, is uk)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(solicitor, was general of india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solicitor, was general of india)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solicitor, was general of india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solicitor, is uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(landlord, is uk)