solidarity: was different from trade union federations in poland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, principle
Weight: 0.59
, movement
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.34
, unity
Weight: 0.34
, faith
Weight: 0.33
, patriotism
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different from trade union federations in poland 1.00
was different from other trade union federations in poland 1.00
was different from trade union federations 0.98
was different from other trade union federations 0.98
be important to unions 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(solidarity, be important to unions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(solidarity, be important to unions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)