solo: has quality standard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.53
, setting
Weight: 0.52
, duet
Weight: 0.51
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.32
, recital
Weight: 0.30
, tour
Weight: 0.30
, concert
Weight: 0.30
, exhibition
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality standard 1.00
is standard hard 0.90
is standard terrible 0.85
has quality good 0.83
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.81
is standard rank distribution different 0.80
is standard rank distribution 0.80
has quality price 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(exhibition, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tour, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tour, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tour, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(exhibition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(exhibition, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(guitar, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(solo, has quality standard)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(solo, is standard hard)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(solo, is standard hard)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(solo, is standard hard)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(solo, is standard hard)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, is standard terrible)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(solo, is standard terrible)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is standard terrible)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(solo, is standard terrible)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(solo, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(solo, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(solo, is standard rank distribution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(solo, is standard rank distribution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(solo, is standard rank distribution different)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solo, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(solo, is standard rank distribution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(solo, is standard rank distribution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(solo, is standard rank distribution different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solo, is standard rank distribution different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(solo, is standard rank distribution different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(solo, has quality standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tour, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(exhibition, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality standard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)