somalia: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.59
, nation
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
, region
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings libya
Weight: 0.35
, central african republic
Weight: 0.35
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, kosovo
Weight: 0.34
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
is poor country 0.93
is poor county 0.81
has quality bad 0.78
is impoverished 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(somalia, is poor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(somalia, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(libya, is poor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(kosovo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(kosovo, is poor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(libya, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(libya, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor country)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(somalia, is poor)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor country)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(somalia, is poor country)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(somalia, is poor country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor county)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(somalia, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(kosovo, is poor)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(libya, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor country)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(somalia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)