son: be taller than fathers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taller than fathers 1.00
be more important than daughters 0.78
disrespect fathers 0.77
is treated better than daughters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(son, be taller than fathers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(son, disrespect fathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(son, disrespect fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(son, disrespect fathers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughters)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, disrespect fathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, be taller than fathers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(son, be taller than fathers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(son, be taller than fathers)