son: were valued in society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were valued in society 1.00
were extremely valued in society 0.94
were valued in jewish society 0.90
were extremely valued in jewish society 0.89
be valued more than daughters in china 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(son, were valued in society)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(son, were extremely valued in jewish society)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(son, were valued in jewish society)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(son, were extremely valued in jewish society)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(son, were valued in jewish society)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(son, were extremely valued in jewish society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(son, were valued in jewish society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(son, were extremely valued in jewish society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(son, were valued in jewish society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(son, were valued in society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(son, were valued in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(son, were valued in society)