sonar: be different

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.62 , equipment Weight: 0.59 , method Weight: 0.57 , tool Weight: 0.56 , field Weight: 0.55
Siblings	smoke detector Weight: 0.34 , galvanometer Weight: 0.33 , ultrasound Weight: 0.33 , electronic device Weight: 0.33 , cooling device Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be different	1.00
was different from other people	0.86
was different from people	0.84
be different to sounds	0.79
be like imageoptin	0.76
be like annoyatron	0.76
be like chromecast	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(sonar, be different)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(method, was different from people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(sonar, be different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(method, was different from people)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(method, was different from people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(method, was different from other people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(sonar, be different)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(method, was different from people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(sonar, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(ultrasound, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(ultrasound, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(sonar, be different)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(sonar, be different to sounds)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(sonar, be different to sounds)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(sonar, be different to sounds)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different to sounds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(sonar, be different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(method, was different from people)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(ultrasound, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(method, was different from people)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(sonar, be different) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)