sotho: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.32
, group
Weight: 0.31
Siblings programming language
Weight: 0.24
, english language
Weight: 0.24
, sign language
Weight: 0.24
, italian language
Weight: 0.24
, chinese language
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sotho, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sign language, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(group, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sign language, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sign language, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sotho, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sotho, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sotho, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sotho, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sotho, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sign language, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sotho, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(group, has quality good)