south africa: was banned in 1964

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south korea
Weight: 0.81
, africa
Weight: 0.80
, south america
Weight: 0.78
, latin america
Weight: 0.73
Siblings new zealand
Weight: 0.69
, australia
Weight: 0.66
, germany
Weight: 0.65
, france
Weight: 0.64
, south
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
was banned in 1964 1.00
was banned from olympics 0.85
was banned from cricket 0.83
was excluded from 1960-1991 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned from cricket)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was excluded from 1960-1991)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(south africa, was excluded from 1960-1991)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(south africa, was excluded from 1960-1991)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(south africa, was excluded from 1960-1991)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned in 1964)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964)