south pole: be in darkness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot spot
Weight: 0.61
, pole
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.58
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.86
, telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, west point
Weight: 0.35
, south
Weight: 0.35
, west
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in darkness 1.00
have 24 hours of darkness 0.95
be in darkness during winter 0.93
have 6 months of darkness 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pole, have 24 hours of darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, have 6 months of darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pole, be in darkness during winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pole, have 6 months of darkness)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pole, have 6 months of darkness)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south pole, be in darkness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(pole, have 24 hours of darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south pole, be in darkness)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pole, be in darkness during winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south pole, be in darkness)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, have 6 months of darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south pole, be in darkness)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(south pole, be in darkness)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(south pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(south pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(south pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(south pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(south pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(south pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(south pole, have 6 months of darkness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south pole, be in darkness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 6 months of darkness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(south pole, be in darkness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 6 months of darkness)